Kamil Capkovic vs Bjorn Phau Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W L W W L
Form
L L W L L L W W L LHead To Head: Capkovic 1 - 1 Phau
They have played 4 sets in total, with Capkovic winning 2 and Phau winning 2. The last match between Capkovic and Phau was at the Trnava Challenger, 23-09-2011, Quarterfinals, Clay with Kamil Capkovic getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kamil Capkovic | 1 |
| Bjorn Phau | 1 |
Trnava Challenger(23-09-2011)
6
4
6
4
| Capkovic | Stats | Phau |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 211 | Highest Rank | 59 |
| 38 | Age | 45 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 14 | Titles | 7 |
| 59% (383-264) | Career Total W/L | 53% (498-433) |
| $21,615 | Career Prize Money | $673,811 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Griekspoor PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Kamil Capkovic
Player
Bjorn Phau
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
67)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 16 | Games Won | 20 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 0:49:55 | Average Match Time | 0:49:55 |
| 63% (42/67) | 1st Serve % | 48% (32/67) |
| 57% (24/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (20/32) |
| 64% (16/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (11/35) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 54% (36/67) | Return Points Win % | 40% (27/67) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kamil Capkovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 5-7 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Bjorn Phau Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Bjorn Phau
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve %
37%
(
7 of
19)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
6 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
33
Total Points Won
13
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximilian Neuchrist
Player
Bjorn Phau
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
47%
(
31 of
66)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Bjorn Phau
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bjorn Phau
Player
Jurgen Zopp
55%
(
58 of
105)
1st Serve %
62%
(
65 of
105)
8
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
47 of
65)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blaz Kavcic
Player
Bjorn Phau
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jules Marie
Player
Bjorn Phau
75%
(
64 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bjorn Phau
Player
Aljaz Bedene
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
77
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Berrer
Player
Bjorn Phau
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
36%
(
17 of
47)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rhyne Williams
Player
Bjorn Phau
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
46%
(
21 of
46)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (383/264) | Win/Loss | 53% (498/433) |
| 57% (853/633) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1142/1030) |
| 53% (7303/6446) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (10444/10069) |
| 61% (121/76) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (237/157) |
| 61% (202/130) | Clay Win/Loss | 49% (140/144) |
| 51% (59/56) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (114/113) |
| 33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 27% (7/19) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 282 | Aces Total | 1292 |
| 0.06 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 371 | Total Double Faults | 1206 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 538.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 565.48 |
| 62% (3336/5351) | 1st Serve % | 54% (13069/24192) |
| 65% (2184/3336) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (9081/12992) |
| 45% (898/2015) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (5516/11036) |
| 44% (238/535) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (969/2319) |
| 40% (2186/5456) | Return Points Win % | 39% (9402/24166) |
| 22% (2/7) | Slam W/L | 52% (50/47) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 46% (23/27) |
| 0% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (6/10) | Main Tour W/L | 48% (128/136) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (132/127) | Challenger W/L | 57% (297/223) |
| 67% (243/118) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (377/631) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (483/887) |
| 14% (1/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 26% (9/35) |
| 50% (86/171) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (142/284) |
| 56% (109/196) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (136/270) |
| 87% (362/315) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (502/416) |
| 13% (362/46) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (502/86) |
| 24% (284/67) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (429/82) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
